DENIGRATION OF MARTYRS
LIKE BHAGAT SINGH-RAJGURU-SUKHDEV: A PEEP INTO RSS ARCHIVES
ON 95TH
ANNIVERSARY OF MARTYRDOM OF BHAGAT SINGH-RAJGURU-SUKHDEV
Here is a passage from the
chapter, ‘Martyr, great but not ideal’ of Bunch Of Thoughts, the
collection of writings of MS Golwalkar decrying the whole tradition of
martyrs. After declaring that his objects of worship have always been
successful lives and that 'Bhartiya culture' [which surely means RSS culture]
does not adore and idealize martyrdom and do not treat "such martyrs as
their heroes", he went on to philosophise that,
“There is no doubt that such man who embrace
martyrdom are great heroes and their philosophy too is pre-eminently manly.
They are far above the average men who meekly submit to fate and remain in fear
and inaction. All the same, such persons are not held up as ideals in our
society. We have not looked upon their martyrdom as the highest point of
greatness to which men should aspire. For, after all, they failed in achieving
their ideal, and failure implies some fatal flaw in them.” [Bunch of Thoughts, p. 283.]
Could there be a statement
more insulting and denigrating to the martyrs than this?
“Patriotism is not only going
to prison. It is not correct to be carried away by such superficial patriotism.
He used to urge that while remaining prepared to die for the country when the
time came, it is very necessary to have a desire to live while organizing for
the freedom of the country.” [CP Bhishikar, Sanghavariksh Ke Beej: Dr.
Keshavrao Hedgewar, p. 21.]
It is indeed a pity that Bhagat
Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Ashfaqullah Khan and Chandrashekhar Azad did not come
into contact with this contemporary great patriotic thinker. If they had the
great opportunity to meet him, these martyrs could have been saved from giving
their lives for ‘superficial patriotism’.
Even the word ‘shameful’ is not appropriate to
describe the attitude of the RSS leadership towards those who had sacrificed
everything in the struggle against the British rulers. The last Mughal ruler of
India, Bahadur Shah Zafar had emerged as the rallying point for the patriotic
Indians and symbol of the Great War of Independence of 1857. Golwalkar wrote
thus while making fun of him:
“In 1857, the so-called last emperor of India had given the clarion
call-Gazio mein bu rahegi jub talak eeman ki/takhte London tak chalegi tegh
Hindustan ki (Till the warriors remain faithful to their commitment/Indian
swords will reach throne of London.) But ultimately what happened? Everybody
knows that. [Golwalkar, M.S., Shri Guruji Samagar Darshan (collected works
of Golwalkar in Hindi), Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, nd., volume 1, p. 121.]
What
Golwalkar thought of the people sacrificing their lot for the country is
obvious from the following words of his also. He had the temerity to ask the
great revolutionaries who wished to lay down their lives for the freedom of the
motherland the following question as if he was representing the British:
“But one
should think whether complete national interest is accomplished by that?
Sacrifice does not lead to increase in the thinking of the society of giving
all for the interest of the nation. It is borne by the experience up to now
that this fire in the heart is unbearable to the common people.” [Ibid.
pp. 61-62.]
This also must be the reason that RSS produced no fighters or
martyrs during the Freedom Movement.
It is the duty of every patriotic Indian who respects these
great martyrs to share these anti-national and degenerated horrendous ideas of
RSS against anti-colonial freedom struggle and martyrs with family and friends
so that Hindutva gang is exposed forcefully.
Shamsul Islam