Tuesday, April 30, 2024

RSS DECEIT ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESERVATION

 

RSS DECEIT ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESERVATION

        RSS which claims to be the biggest organization of Hindus in the world is, in fact, a unique organization which trains its cadres in manufacturing and spreading lies in the pure Goebbelian tradition. It functions as a gurukul; a high Caste learning institution for Hindu high Castes where students also graduate in practising what George Orwell termed ‘doublespeak’ and thus RSS has rightly been described as an “organization that thrives on political doublespeak”. [Edit, ‘Sangh’s triple-speak’, The Times of India, 26 August 2002.]. It is through lies that poison is spread against lower Castes, minorities and all those who stand for multi-culturalism.

        India came face to face with this inherent trait of RSS when its Supremo Mohan Bhagwat in a speech at Hyderabd (April 28, 2024) while reacting to a video (in which a RSS luminary called upon to finish off constitutional Reservation) stated 

Ye galat baat hai, asatya hai (This is wrong, false)…“The Sangh has been supporting all reservation as per the Constitution since the beginning. And, the Sangh says that it should continue as long as those for whom it exists feel that it is necessary…It (reservation policy) should continue as long as discrimination exists in society.”

[‘Lok Sabha elections: RSS joins BJP quota firefight as unease grows’, The Telegraph on Line, Kolkata, April 28, 2024.

https://www.telegraphindia.com/elections/lok-sabha-election-2024/lok-sabha-elections-rss-joins-bjp-quota-firefight-as-unease-grows/cid/2016398]

when the founding fathers of the Constitution of independent India made provisions for reservations to Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes, the most prominent ideologue of RSS and 2nd Supremo of the organization, MS Golwalkar strongly reacted by alleging that the rulers “were digging at the roots of Hindu social cohesion and destroying the spirit of identity that had kept all the various sects in a harmonious whole in the past”. [Cited in N. L. Gupta, RSS and Democracy (Delhi: Sampradayikta Virodhi Committee, nd., p. 17] He refused to admit that Hindu social system was at the root of the neglect of the lower castes. [Golwalkar, MS., Bunch of Thoughts, selection of writings/speeches/interviews, Sahitya Sindhu Prakashana, Bangalore, 1996 [3rd edition], p.363.] When he was asked: “What about the protection to Harijans guaranteed in the Constitution and its subsequent extension?” His reply was:

 “Dr. Ambedkar had envisaged the special privileges for ‘Scheduled Castes’ for only 10 years from the day we became a Republic in 1950. But it is going on, being extended. Continued special privileges on the basis of caste only, is bound to create vested interests in them in remaining as a separate entity. That would harm their integration with the rest of the society [Hindu society]. [Golwalkar, MS., Spotlights, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1974, p. 16.]

For Golwalkar, the real issue was not how to undo the injustice done to the lower Castes [Sudras/Dalits] for thousands of years in the past but “take extra care to see that their separateness is not given fillip.” [Golwalkar, MS., Spotlights, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1974, p. 184] He never accepted the fact that lower Castes were being maltreated in India. While reacting to a big carnage of Dalits in a part of India he wrote on October 14, 1972:

“There is a trend these days to give Harijan-non-Harijan colour even to ordinary happenings, probably out of political motivation and digging a rift in the oneness and solidarity of the people. For immediate benefits-even these doubtful-to sacrifice the lasting good of the people as a whole that is the unfortunate aspect of the trends obtaining now a days. In our work, we have to steer clear of this poisonous trend and do our best to clarify the atmosphere.” [Golwalkar, MS., Shri Guruji Sanmgr Darshan, (selection of his writings/speeches in Hindi), vol. 7, Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, 1974, p. 244.]  

        Golwalkar’s hatred for Dalits was outcome of his firm belief in Casteism under which they did not enjoy even right to life. For him Casteism was synonymous with the Hindu nation. According to him, the Hindu people are none else but,

“[The] Virat Purusha, the Almighty manifesting himself…According to purusha sukta sun and moon are his eyes, the stars and the skies are created from his nabhi [navel] and Brahmin is the head, Kshatriya the hands, Vaishya the thighs and Shudra the feet. This means that the people who have this fourfold arrangement, i.e., the Hindu People, is [sic] our God. This supreme vision of Godhead is the very core of our concept of ‘nation’ and has permeated our thinking and given rise to various unique concepts of our cultural heritage. [Italics as in the original]

       [Golwalkar, MS., Bunch of Thoughts, pp. 36-37.]

This was nothing but a re-phrasing of Manu’s inhuman anti-Sudra codes. Golwalkar refused to accept that Casteism was a bane to Hinduism or hindered the feeling of unity among Hindus.

“Persons interested in calumniating Hindus make much of the caste system, the ‘superstitions’, the want of literacy, the position of women in the social structure, and all sorts of true or untrue flaws in the Hindu Cultural Organization, and point out that the weakness of the Hindus lies solely in these.”

[Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, pp. 61– 62.]

Ambedkar, who witnessed RSS growing and was familiar with its destructive tendencies, was of the firm opinion that the ideology of Hindutva practised by RSS was nothing but a ploy by upper Caste Hindus to maintain control over society and its resources. He wrote:

“They have a trait of character which often leads the Hindus to disaster. This trait is formed by their acquisitive instinct and aversion to share with others the good things of life. They have a monopoly of education and wealth, and with wealth and education they have captured the State. To keep this monopoly to themselves has been the ambition and goal of their life. Charged with this selfish idea of class domination, they take every move to exclude the lower classes of Hindus from wealth, education and power...This attitude of keeping education, wealth and power as a close preserve for themselves and refusing to share it, which the high Caste Hindus have developed in their relation with the lower classes of Hindus, is sought to be extended by them to the Muslims. They want to exclude the Muslims from place and power, as they have done to the lower class Hindus. This trait of the high Caste Hindus is the key to the understanding of their politics.”

[Ambedkar, BR., Pakistan or the Partition of India, Government of Maharashtra, Bombay, 1990 (reprint of 1946 edition), p. 123.]

How shamelessly RSS has been opposing Reservation was made clear in 1981 when its cadres played most nefarious role in opposing Reservation to  socially and economically backward Castes in Gujarat introduced by Congress ministry headed by Madhavsinh Solanki. More than 100 people were killed including 2 police officials. It is interesting to note that like today the debate of Reservation was turned in spreading poison against local Muslims who were killed with impunity.

Shamsul Islam

April 30, 2024

Link for some of S. Islam's writings in English, Hindi, Urdu and translations into Marathi, Malayalam, Kannada, Bengali, Punjabi, Gujarati and video interviews/debates:

http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam

Facebook: https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332

Twitter: @shamsforjustice

http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/

Email: notoinjustice@gmail.com

Link for procuring Shamsul Islam’s books in English, Hindi & Urdu:

https://tinyurl.com/shams-books

 

Saturday, April 27, 2024

On 84th Anniversary of Anti-Pakistan 1940 Azad Muslim Conference of Indian Muslims

 

On 84th Anniversary of Anti-Pakistan 1940 Azad Muslim Conference of Indian Muslims

The search for the real culprits behind the Partition of India in 1947 seems to be an endless exercise. It is despite the fact that there is no dearth of writings on the Indian Freedom Struggle against the British rule in India and specially partition of the country on the basis of religion.

Historians have rightly held the Muslim League, led by Mohammed Ali Jinnah, basically responsible for this unnatural and tragic Partition which became a kind of license for both Hindu and Muslim communal elements to indulge in mass butchery of innocent children, women and men.

However, there has always been a school of historiographers under the influence of Hindutva which has been spreading the canard that all Muslims in pre-Partition days supported the Muslim League’s call for Pakistan. Hindutva tries to cover up the fact that it subscribed to the two-nation theory like Muslim League long before the latter subscribed to it and wanted to have an exclusive ”Hindu Rashtra” on the lines of ”Islamic State” of Muslim League.

Unfortunately, this kind of discourse has secured more credibility specially among the Hindu middle class with the recent upsurge of anti-minorityism led by Hindutva fascism. The crucial fact should not be missed here that Hindutva has mainly succeeded in its attempts because facts of significant contributions of those Muslim individuals and organisations that opposed Muslim League with all their resources and might remains buried even today. This criminal silence on the part of the secular state and organisations has only galvanised the Hindu communalists to malign the Muslims of India.

One such example is of Allah Bakhsh who at the grassroots level among Muslims of India organised an effective and massive opposition to the nefarious designs of Muslim League in pre-Partition days. Allah Bakhsh was the Premier (those days chief minister was known by this designation) of Sind during the eventful days of ‘Quit India’ Movement of 1942 as head of the ‘Ittehad Party’ (Unity Party) which did not allow Muslim League to have any foothold in the Muslim majority province of Sind. Allah Bakhsh and his Party were not part of the Indian National Congress but when British Prime Minister Winston Churchill made a derogatory reference to the Indian freedom struggle and the ‘Quit India’ Movement in a speech in the British Parliament, Allah Bakhsh renounced in protest all titles conferred by the British Government.

Description: F:\OLD HDD D DRIVE 8.4.16\Allah Bakhsh\ALLAH BAKHSH-PHOTOS\Alla Bux-FOR PRINT 2.jpg

While announcing this renouncement he stated: “It is the cumulative result of the feeling that the British Government does not want to part with power. Mr. Churchill’s speech shattered all hopes.” The British administration could not digest this dissent of Allah Bakhsh and he was removed from office by the Governor, Sir Hugh Dow, on October 10, 1942. This great sacrifice of a Muslim leader for the freedom of the country remains unknown even today.

The fact that Nathu Ram Godse, closely associated with Hindu Mahasabha, VD Savarkar and the RSS killed MK Gandhi on January 30, 1948 is known by all but how many of us know that Allah Bakhsh a great fighter for the independence of a united India and prolific opponent of the idea of Pakistan was murdered on May 14, 1943, in Sind by professional killers hired by the Muslim League. Allah Bakhsh needed to be liquidated because he was able to muster massive support of common Muslim masses throughout India against Pakistan. Moreover, Allah Bakhsh as a great secularist with massive support in Sind and opposed to the formation of Pakistan could prove to be the greatest stumbling block in the physical formation of Pakistan as without Sind, the ‘Islamic State’ in the west of the country just could not have materialized.

It is a well-known fact that dismissal of Allah Bakhsh Government in 1942 and his murder in 1943 paved the way for entry of Muslim League in Sind. One could see the open ganging up of the British rulers and Muslim League in political and physical liquidation of Allah Bakhsh and his kind of anti-communal politics. It is important to remember that after the assassination of Allah Bakhsh Hindu Mahasabha led by Savarkar joined the coalition government in Sind led by Muslim League.

Sind Muslim League leader M A Khuhro was put on trial as the main conspirator in the killing of Allah Bakhsh. He was found not guilty, as the state could not produce an ‘independent’ witness to prove his involvement. Significantly, it was the same ground on which Savarkar secured acquittal in Gandhiji’s murder case later.

It really needs a serious inquiry that why powerful anti-two nation political trend led by Allah Bakhsh among Indian Muslims got pushed to oblivion. It suited the British masters and both Hindu-Muslim communalists. They saw India as a land of perpetual conflicts among religions. But the Indian secular state, which has the name of Sind in its National Anthem, became totally unmindful to this legacy which stood for a secular, united and democratic India. Allah Bakhsh spent all his life countering communal politics of Muslim League and its two-nation theory. In fact he laid down his life for this cause.

Within 5 weeks of the Pakistan resolution of the Muslim League at Lahore, Indian Muslims organized MUSLIM AZAD CONFERENCE in Delhi (Queen's Park, Chandni Chowk) between April 27-30, 1940 (it was to conclude on April 29 but was extended by one day due to tremendous participation and large number of issues to be deliberated) with 1400 delegates from almost all parts of India attending it.  

The leading light of this conference was former Premier of Sind, Allah Bakhsh who presided over the conference was one of such heroes. The major Muslim organizations represented in this conference were All India Jamiat-ul-Ulema, All India Momin Conference, All India Majlis-e-Ahrar, All-India Shia Political Conference, Khudai Khidmadgars, Bengal Krishak Proja Party, All-India Muslim Parliamentary Board, the Anjuman-e-Watan, Baluchistan, All India Muslim Majlis and Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadis. The Azad Muslim Conference was attended by duly elected delegates from United Province, Bihar, Central Province, Punjab, Sind, NWF Province, Madras, Orissa, Bengal, Malabar, Baluchistan, Delhi, Assam, Rajasthan, Delhi, Kashmir, Hyderabad and many native states thus covering the whole of India.

There was no doubt that these delegates represented “majority of India’s Muslims.” Apart from these organizations a galaxy of leading intellectuals of Indian Muslims like Dr. Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari (who was in the forefront of struggle against the communal politics of Muslim League, died in 1936), Shaukatullah Ansari, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Syed Abdullah Brelvi, Shaikh Mohammed Abdullah, AM Khwaja and Maulana Azad were associated with this movement against Pakistan. Jamiat and other Muslim organizations produced large number of booklets in Urdu against Two-nation theory and in support of co-existence of Hindus and Muslims in India.

Description: C:\Users\user\Downloads\PS-Azad Muslim Conference-Main Gate.jpg

 

The conference resolved that Pakistan scheme was “impracticable and harmful to the country’s interest generally, and of Muslims in particular.” The conference called upon Muslims of India “to own equal responsibilities with other Indians for striving and making sacrifices to achieve the country’s independence.” Muslims like Allah Bakhsh who opposed the Muslim League and challenged its communal politics had done thorough home work as will be clear from the contents of presidential address delivered in Urdu by Allah Bakhsh at Delhi Conference. He advanced historical facts to counter postulations of Muslim League and invited its leadership to respond to the ideological issues raised.

While decrying the concept of a theocratic state itself he said stated:

“It was based on a false understanding that India is inhabited by two nations, Hindu and Muslim. It is much more to the point to say that all Indian Mussalmans are proud to be Indian Nationals and they are equally proud that their spiritual level and creedal realm is Islam. As Indian nationals-Muslims and Hindus and others, inhabit the land and share every inch of the motherland and all its material and cultural treasures alike according to the measure of their just and fair rights and requirements as the proud sons of the soil…It is a vicious fallacy for Hindus, Muslims and other inhabitants of India to arrogate to themselves and exclusively proprietary rights over either the whole or any particular part of India. The country as an indivisible whole and as one federated and composite unit belongs to all the inhabitants of the country alike, and is as much the inalienable and imprescriptible heritage of the Indian Muslims as of other Indians. No segregated or isolated regions, but the whole of India is the Homeland of all the Indian Muslims and no Hindu or Muslim or any other has the right to deprive them of one inch of this Homeland.”

He made it clear that communalism was the creation of high castes among Muslims and Hindus. According to him:

“These feelings and ambitions among those who hope to constitute the ruling caste among Hindus or Muslims, as successors of the present Imperial Rulers [the British], revive and invent excuses for popular consumption from historical or other sources, and by securing the support of groups, manoeuver themselves into a position to play the political chess, which promises a possible prospect of success in their aim of becoming the rulers of the masses either integrally of the entire country or of a delimited region.”

He asked the Muslim Leagures and other flag-bearers of Muslim separatism a question based on Islamic historical experiences:

“Had the imperialistic structure of society been a guarantee of the prosperity of the Muslim masses and had empires not carried the germs of their own decay in them, then the mighty Omaiyad, Abbasid, Sarasenic, Fatimide, Sassanic, Moghal and Turkish empires would never have crumbled, leaving 1/5th of the human race, who live by Islamic faith in the condition in which they find themselves today-disinterested, and destitute in the bulk. Similarly those Hindus who entertain similar dreams, and who out of tendentiously written pages of history or out of the stimulating examples of the modern imperialists select ingredients for the nourishment of their imperial dreams, or dreams of exploitation, imposition and domination will be well advised to discard such ideals.”

He was right in complaining (which also throws light on how Muslim League got prominence) that, ”Indian Mussalmans have a legitimate cause of complaint against the Congress on the ground that it has not found it possible so far to confer with them [anti-League Muslims of India] for a settlement of the communal issue.”

Allah Bakhsh in his address defended greatly the composite Indian culture,

“When they talk of Muslim culture they forget the composite culture which the impact of Hindus and Muslims has been shaping for the last 1000 years or more and in which is born a type of culture and civilisation in India in the production of which Muslims have been proud and active partners. It cannot now merely by creating artificial States be withdrawn to segregated areas. To art and literature, architecture and music, history and philosophy and to the administrative system of India, the Mussalmans have been contributing for a thousand years, their share of coordinated, composite and syncretic culture which occupies a distinctly distinguished place in the types of civilisations which hold a prominent place in the world. It would be a disastrous loss to civilisation if it was proposed to withdraw all this to two corners of India and leave nothing behind the ruins and debris of this contribution. Such a proposal can only emanate from defeatist mentality. No, gentleman, the whole of India is our motherland and in every possible walk of life we are co-sharers with other inhabitants of the country as brothers in the same cause, viz., the freedom of the country, and no false or defeatist sentiment can possibly persuade us to give up our proud position of being the equal sons of this great country.”

Allah Bakhsh, while calling upon to guard against communalism, declared that the goal of the anti-communal movement must be, “to build up a vigorous, healthy, progressive and honoured India enjoying its well-deserved freedom.” It is really shocking that we have Savarkar’s statue in Parliament who was an ideological co-traveller of Muslim League but no place for Allah Bakhsh. It is only a living testimony to the communal political structure which secular India is forced to live today.

[For detailed study of Azad Muslim Conference read author’s book MUSLIMS AGAINST PARTITION OF INDIA: REVISITING THE LEGACY OF PATRIOTIC MUSLIMS (5th edition published by Pharos Media & Publishing Pvt. Ltd. Delhi with website: www.pharosmedia.com). It is also available in Hindi, Urdu, Bengali, Kannada, and Punjabi.]

Shamsul Islam

April 27, 2024

Link for some of S. Islam's writings in English, Hindi, Urdu and translations into Marathi, Malayalam, Kannada, Bengali, Punjabi, Gujarati and video interviews/debates:

http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam

Facebook: https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332

Twitter: @shamsforjustice

http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/

Email: notoinjustice@gmail.com

Link for procuring Shamsul Islam’s books in English, Hindi & Urdu:

https://tinyurl.com/shams-books

 

Monday, April 8, 2024

प्रिय प्रधानमंत्री मोदी जी, आज़ादी से पहले भारत में मुस्लिम लीग के साथ कांग्रेस की नहीं बल्कि हिंदुत्व गिरोह की मिलीभगत थी!

 

प्रिय प्रधानमंत्री मोदी जी, आज़ादी से पहले भारत में मुस्लिम लीग के साथ कांग्रेस की नहीं बल्कि हिंदुत्व गिरोह की मिलीभगत थी!

हमारे प्रधानमंत्री खुद को 'हिंदू' राष्ट्रवादी और आरएसएस का सदस्य बताते हैं। वह गर्व से इस तथ्य को साझा करते हैं कि उन्हें हिंदुत्व राजनीति के दो पिताओं में से एक, एमएस गोलवलकर (दूसरे थे वीडी सावरकर) ने एक राजनीतिक नेता बनने के लिए तैयार किया था। उन से ही उन्हों ने भारत में धर्मनिरपेक्षता को खत्म करने और हिंदुत्व राजनीति स्थापित करने का काम सीख था।
हिंदुत्व के कट्टरपंथियों की नज़र में पीएम मोदी पुनर्जीवित सनातन धर्म का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं और हिंदुओं के दुश्मनों के खिलाफ हिंदू राष्ट्रवाद के रक्षक हैं। मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना के नेतृत्व वाली स्वतंत्रता-पूर्व मुस्लिम लीग पीएम मोदी के लिए एक पसंदीदा और आसान निशाना है जो उन्हें भारतीय मुसलमानों के खिलाफ नफरत फैलाने में भी मदद करता है। किसी भी चुनाव में मोदी मुस्लिम अलगाववाद के खिलाफ एक अथक योद्धा का रूप धारण कर लेते हैं। आगामी संसदीय चुनावों के लिए भारतीय राष्ट्रीय कांग्रेस के सार्वजनिक किए गए घोषणापत्र पर प्रतिक्रिया व्यक्त करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश के सहारनपुर (जहां मुसलमानों की बड़ी आबादी है और धार्मिक ध्रुवीकरण का इतिहास है) में एक चुनावी रैली में उन्होंने घोषणा की कि कांग्रेस का घोषणापत्र, जिसे कल जारी किया गया [5 अप्रैल, 2024], दर्शाता है कि यह देश की आकांक्षाओं को पूरा नहीं कर सकता। कांग्रेस के घोषणापत्र में आज़ादी से पहले मुस्लिम लीग की नीतियों की छाप है।

[‘Congress manifesto reflects policies of Muslim League before Independence: PM Narendra Modi’, The Indian Express, Delhi, April 7, 2024.

https://www.telegraphindia.com/elections/lok-sabha-election-2024/congress-manifesto-reflects-policies-of-muslim-league-before-independence-pm-narendra-modi/cid/2011716]

आरएसएस/हिंदुत्व के एक नेता और विचारक के रूप में मोदी को घोर झूठ बोलने के लिए (आरएसएस दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा गुरुकुल या विश्वविद्यालय है जो बे-सर-पैर झूठ बोलने का प्रशिक्षण देता है) माफ किया जा सकता है लेकिन भारत के प्रधान मंत्री के रूप में नहीं। किसी भी जवाबदेही पर आधारित लोकतंत्र में उन पर झूठी गवाही देने का आरोप लगाया गया होता और उन्हें पद छोड़ने के लिए मजबूर किया गया होता। लेकिन वर्तमान परिदृश्य में जब भारतीय चुनावों का नियामक, भारत का चुनाव आयोग सत्तारूढ़ दल का जी-हज़ूर बन गया है, केवल भारत के लोग ही ऐसे झूठ को सबक सिखा सकते हैं।

आइये, यह जानने के लिए कि स्वतंत्रता-पूर्व भारत में मुस्लिम लीग के असली दोस्त कौन थे हम हिंदुत्व अभिलेखागार से परिचित हों।

सावरकर दो-राष्ट्र सिद्धांत के प्रवर्तक के रूप में
सावरकर हिंदुत्व की राजनीति के जन्मदाताओं में से एक हिंदू राष्ट्रवादी थे जिन्होंने सबसे विस्तृत दो-राष्ट्र सिद्धांत विकसित किया था। इस तथ्य को नजरअंदाज नहीं किया जाना चाहिए कि मुस्लिम लीग ने अपना पाकिस्तान प्रस्ताव 22-23 मार्च 1940 में ही पारित किया, लेकिन आरएसएस के महान दार्शनिक और मार्गदर्शक सावरकर ने उससे बहुत पहले द्वि-राष्ट्र सिद्धांत का प्रचार किया था। 1937 में अहमदाबाद में हिंदू महासभा के 19वें सत्र में अध्यक्षीय भाषण देते हुए सावरकर ने स्पष्ट रूप से घोषणा की:

"फिलहाल हिन्दुस्तान में दो प्रतिदुवांधि राष्ट्र आस-पास रह रहे हैं।  कई अपरिपक्व राजनीतिज्ञे यह मानकर गंभीर ग़लती कर बैठते हैं कि हिंदुस्तान पहले से ही एक सद्भावपूर्ण राज्य के रूप में ढल गया है या सिर्फ हमारी इच्छा होने से ही इस रूप में ढल जाएगा। इस प्रकार के हमारे नेक नियत वाले पर लापरवाह दोस्त मात्र सपनों को सच्चाईयों को बदलना चाहते हैं।  दृढ़ सच्चाई यह है कि तथाकथित साम्प्रदायिक सवाल और कुछ नहीं बल्कि सैंकड़ों सालों से हिन्दू और मुसलमान के बीच सांस्कृतिक, धार्मिक और राष्ट्रीय प्रतिदुवांधिता के नतीजे में हम तक पहुंचे हैं।  आज यह क़तई नहीं माना जा सकता कि हिंदुस्तान एक एकता में पिरोया हुआ और मिलाजुला राष्ट्र है। बल्कि इसके विपरीत हिंदुस्तान में मुख्यतौर पर दो राष्ट्र हैं-हिन्दू और मुसलमान।"

[Savarkar, VD., Samagar Savarkar Wangmaya (Collected Works of Savarkar), vol. 6, Hindu Mahasabha,  Poona, 1963, p.296.]

आरएसएस द्वि-राष्ट्र सिद्धांत के प्रवर्तक के रूप में
सावरकर के पद्द-चिन्हों पर चलते हुए आरएसएस ने इस विचार को सिरे से खारिज कर दिया कि हिंदू और मुस्लिम मिलकर एक राष्ट्र का निर्माण करते हैं। स्वतंत्रता की पूर्व संध्या (14 अगस्त, 1947) पर आरएसएस के अंग्रेजी मुखपत्र ऑर्गेनाइज़र ने एक संपादकीय में राष्ट्र की अपनी अवधारणा को निम्नलिखित शब्दों में प्रस्तुत किया:

"राष्ट्रत्व की छद्म धारणाओं से गुमराह होने से हमें बचना चाहिए। बहुत सारे दिमाग़ी भ्रम और वर्तमान एवं भविष्य की परेशानियों को दूर किया जा सकता है अगर हम इस आसान तथ्य को स्वीकारें कि हिंदुस्थान में सिर्फ हिंदू ही राष्ट्र का निर्माण करते हैं और राष्ट्र  का ढांचा उसी सुरक्षित और उपयुक्त बुनियाद पर खड़ा किया जाना चाहिए...स्वयं राष्ट्र को हिंदुओं द्वारा हिंदू परम्पराओं, संस्कृति, विचारों और आकांक्षाओं के आधार पर ही गठित किया जाना चाहिए।"

हिंदू महासभा और मुस्लिम लीग की मिलीभगत पर डॉ अंबेडकर
स्वतंत्रता-पूर्व भारत में सांप्रदायिक राजनीति के गहन शोधकर्ता बाबा साहब डॉ. बी.आर. अम्बेडकर ने द्वि-राष्ट्र सिद्धांत के मुद्दे पर हिंदू महासभा और मुस्लिम लीग के बीच आत्मीयता और सौहार्द को रेखांकित करते हुए लिखा:

"यह बात भले विचित्र लगे लेकिन एक राष्ट्र बनाम दो राष्ट्र के प्रशन पर मिस्टर सावरकर मिस्टर जिन्ना के विचार परस्पर विरोधी होने के बजाय एक-दूसरे से पूरी तरह मेल खाते हैं। दोनों ही इसे स्वीकार करते हैं, और केवल स्वीकार करते हैं बल्कि इस बात पर जोर देते हैं कि भारत में दो राष्ट्र हैं- एक मुस्लिम राष्ट्र और दूसरा हिंदू राष्ट्र।"

[B. R. Ambedkar, Pakistan or the Partition of India, Govt. of Maharashtra, Bombay, 1990 [Reprint of 1940 edition], p. 142.]

 

सावरकर के नेतृत्व में हिंदू महासभा ने मुस्लिम लीग के साथ गठबंधन सरकारें चलाईं
वर्तमान में भारत पर शासन करने वाले हिंदू राष्ट्रवादी सावरकर की संतानें शर्मनाक तथ्य को छुपाती हैं कि सावरकर के नेतृत्व में हिंदू महासभा ने संयुक्त स्वतंत्रता संग्राम, विशेष रूप से ब्रिटिश शासकों के खिलाफ 1942 के भारत छोड़ो आंदोलन को तोड़ने के लिए मुस्लिम लीग के साथ गठबंधन किया था। 1942 में कानपुर (कानपुर) में हिंदू महासभा के 24वें सत्र में अध्यक्षीय भाषण देते हुए, उन्होंने निम्नलिखित शब्दों में मुस्लिम लीग के साथ मित्रता का बचाव किया,

"हिंदू महासभा जानती है कि व्यावहारिक राजनीति में हमें तर्कसंगत समझौतों के साथ आगे बढ़ना चाहिए। हाल ही सिंध की सच्चाई को समझें, जहां निमंत्रण मिलने पर सिंध हिंदू महासभा ने मुस्लिम लीग के साथ मिल कर साझा सरकार चलाने की जिम्मेदारी ली। बंगाल का उदाहरण भी सब के सामने है। उद्दंड (मुस्लिम) लीगी जिन्हें कांग्रेस अपने तमाम आत्म समर्पणों के बावजूद खुश नहीं रख सकी, हिंदू महासभा के संपर्क में आने के बाद तर्कसंगत समझौतों और परस्पर सामाजिक व्यवहार को तैयार हो गए। श्री फजलुलहक की प्रीमियरशिप (मुख्यमंत्रित्व) तथा महासभा के निपुण सम्माननीय नेता डॉ. श्यामाप्रसाद मुखर्जी के नेतृत्व में दोनों समुदायों के हित साधते हुए एक साल तक सफलतापूर्वक चली। इसके अलावा हमारे कामकाज से यह भी सिद्ध हो गया कि हिंदू महासभा ने राजनीतिक सत्ता केवल आमजन के हितार्थ प्राप्त की थी, कि सत्ता के सुख पाने लाभ बटोरने के लिए।"

[यहाँ यह याद रखना ज़रूरी है कि हिन्दू महासभा और मुस्लिम लीग ने उत्तर-पश्चिमी सीमांत प्रांत (NWFP) में भी साझा सरकार चलायी थी।]

[Savarkar, VD., Samagar Savarkar Wangmaya (Collected Works of Savarkar), vol. 6, Hindu Mahasabha,  Poona, 1963, pp.479-480.]

यह हमारे प्यारे वतन की त्रासदी है कि प्रधान-मंत्री पद पर बैठा एक व्यक्ति आरएसएस की शाखाओं और बौद्धिक शिविरों (वैचारिक प्रशिक्षण शिविरों) में सीखे गए बेशर्म झूठ का सहारा लेता है, जिसकी पुष्टि हिंदुत्व अभिलेखागार भी नहीं करते हैं। वे अपने पद से जुड़े सम्मान, प्रतिष्ठा और मर्यादा के साथ विश्वासघात कर रहे हैं। राष्ट्र को प्रधान-मंत्री मोदी से अनुरोध करना चाहिए कि यदि वह आरएसएस के कैडर के रूप में कार्य करना चाहते हैं तो उन्हें पद से इस्तीफा दे देना चाहिए और आरएसएस के शीर्ष अधिकारियों की पंक्ति में से एक पद तुरंत शुशोभित करलेना चाहिये ताकी दुनिया के सब से बड़े जनतन्त्र को विनाश से बचाया जा सके।

शम्सुल इस्लाम 
4 अप्रैल 2024

 

शम्सुल इस्लाम के अंग्रेजी, हिंदी, उर्दू, मराठी, मलयालम, कन्नड़, बंगाली, पंजाबी, गुजराती में लेखन और कुछ वीडियो साक्षात्कार/बहस के लिए देखें :

http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam

Facebook: https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332

Twitter: @shamsforjustice

http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/

Email: notoinjustice@gmail.com

शम्सुल इस्लाम की अंग्रेज़ी, हिन्दी और उर्दू किताबें प्राप्त करने के लिये लिंक:

https://tinyurl.com/shams-books