Hindutva Hoax
of Vegetarian Hinduism
“Members of the
Muslim community having a Roza Iftar party, and during the said
Iftar
party, while partaking of food,
non-vegetarian food is said to have been consumed by the members
of the Muslim community, who are then alleged to have thrown
the remains into the River Ganges. This fact in the
dispassionate opinion of the Court could rightly
be said to hurt religious
sentiments of the Hindu community.”
[Allahabad High
Court judgement delivered on May 15, 2026]
“A group of
dacoits clad only in undergarments allegedly carried out multiple robberies in
Mustafabad and Sithauli villages [Uttar Pradesh]…Armed intruders reportedly
scaled the wall of farmer Nizakat’s house in the early hours of Wednesday [May
20, 2026] and held his family hostage… When resisted, they assaulted the
inmates, critically injuring six people…According to the police, the robbers
beat women also for keeping a chicken dish at home, and told them to eat only
vegetables.”
[The New Indian
Express, May 21, 2026]
With RSS cadres in full control of the Indian State, June 2014
onward, the country has become a laboratory for a major dietary fabrication
that vegetarianism is Sanatan to Hinduism. It is not that prior to
Modi’s coming to power the concept did not exist, a substantial and powerful
section of the ruling elite including Gandhi were vociferous believers in it.
However, it was not a project for which Indian State worked vehemently.
The neo-zealots
of vegetarian Hinduism argue that diet was not just nourishment for the body. It
was a matter of spiritual realm which shaped “our thoughts, emotions, and
karmic vibrations… The Vedas say, ‘Yad annam, tad manas’ which means ‘As
is the food, so is the mind’ …Vegetarian food is considered sattvik-pure,
calm, and balanced. It nurtures peace, compassion, and mental clarity.
Non-vegetarian food, on the other hand, is tamasic- heavy, aggressive, and
rooted in destruction. It dulls our spiritual perception and increases lower
tendencies like anger, fear, and restlessness.” [https://www.adityavastu.in/post/eating-non-veg-and-its-impact-on-karmikta]
Of course,
these zealots continue consuming curd as vegetarian dish despite the fact that
latter is fundamentally a non-veg food!
With the
beginning of Modi era, it became normal to ban sale and consumption of non-veg eatables
for long periods during many religious festivals and many areas permanently
declared out of bound for selling/consuming it. The issue of food was
weaponized and both seller as well as consumers of non-veg cuisine were
declared to be evil elements, a threat to Hinduism and society. Another
sinister dimension added was that meat consumers were also attacked for
indulging in beef-eating. There are countless incidents in public domain when
non-veg consumers were attacked, lynched, their houses bulldozed, even burnt.
The zeal of
RSS-BJP rulers in enforcing vegetarian Hinduism is to be seen and believed in
dealing with foreign dignitaries. President of Russia Vladimir Putin visiting
India in 2025 was chief guest at a lavish dinner thrown by India President on December
6, 2025) where only vegetarian cuisines were served. It was no different when EU
delegation was State Guest on January 29, 2026, Seychelles President Patrick
Herminie was chief guest at State dinner on February 9, 2026 and Vietnamese PM To
Lam on May 6, 2026).
Only vegetarian menu of the banquet
hosted by President Murmu for Seychelles President. For other dignitaries too
it was only vegetarian menu with different dishes.
Across India,
across educational institutions, businesses, railways and social-religious
gatherings non-veg food has been banned. Debarshi Dasgupta (Strait Times, May
18, 2026) lamented the fact that in “Uttar Pradesh, a state also governed by
the BJP, curated a list of local cuisines from each of its 75 districts and
released it in May. It is a list that includes over 200 dishes, but, again, not
a single one of them is meat-based. What makes this ludicrous is that more than
half of the state’s population (53.6 per cent), according to a government
survey, confirmed eating fish, chicken or other kinds of meat. It is also a
state celebrated for its meat-based cuisines, particularly its capital,
Lucknow, whose kebabs are legendary.”
Interestingly,
the kebab “even found specific praise from the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), when it added Lucknow to its
‘Cities of Gastronomy’ list in 2025. But when Minister of Culture and Tourism
Gajendra Singh Shekhawat feted this decision on social media, he disingenuously
used a poster of food items that were – no surprise here – entirely
vegetarian”.
Pushpesh Pant,
a renowned Indian academic and food historian as quoted by Dasgupta stated: “It
is also a thinly disguised persecution of Muslims, many of whom are perceived
to be butchers and vendors of meat and who supposedly are the beef-eaters.”
[https://asianews.network/a-tikka-tangle-all-veg-menus-at-indian-state-banquets-raise-hackles/]
Varanasi
Iftar-on-Boat Arrests
If we want to
understand the gravity of weaponization against non-veg consumers and surrender
of the State including judiciary, the case known as Varanasi Iftar-on-Boat
Arrests needs to be taken note of. According to a detailed report of
Shinjinee Majumdar in The Wire (March 27, 2026), the controversy started with a
video of March 15 “in which 14 men — Azad Ali, Aamir Kaiki, Danish Saifi, Mohd.
Ahmad, Nehal Afridi, Mahfooz Alam, Mohd. Anas, Mohd. Awwal, Mohd. Tahseem,
Mohd. Ahmad alias Raja, Mohd. Noor Ismail, Mohd. Tausif Ahmad, Mohd. Faizan,
and Mohd. Sameer — were seen breaking their Ramzan-month fast on a boat,
allegedly consuming chicken biryani”.
The video was
uploaded by one of the group members and soon went viral. According to The Wire report: “A complaint
filed on March 16 by Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM)’s Varanasi president
Rajat Jaiswal accused them of hurting religious sentiments by consuming
non-vegetarian food on the river and disposing of waste into it. The police
subsequently arrested 14 men under multiple charges, including hurting
religious sentiments, public nuisance and polluting water. Days later, more
serious charges — including extortion — were added, significantly raising the
legal stakes.”
Jaiswal’s
complaint on which Varanasi police took immediate action stated that eating
non-veg while riding a boat at Ganga Mother was a grave sin. Moreover, after eating they washed their
hands, dumping the waste, thus hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus.
The initial
charges against the accused included: Section 298 BNS — Defiling a place of
worship with intent to insult a religion, Section 299 BNS — Deliberate and
malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, Section 196(1)(B) BNS —
Promoting enmity between groups on religious grounds, Section 270 BNS — Public
nuisance, Section 279 BNS — Fouling water of a public spring or reservoir, Section
223(B) BNS — Disobedience of an order by a public servant and Section 24, Water
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
Later two more
serious charges were added, Section 308(5) BNS — Extortion under threat of
death or grievous hurt and Section 67, Information Technology Act — Publishing
or transmitting obscene material (linked to the viral video).
With these
additions, the potential punishment increased significantly — from a maximum of
around six years (under the Water Act) to up to 10 years due to the extortion
charge.
According to
The Wire report, a Varanasi court had denied bail to the accused on March 23. They had earlier been remanded to 14 days
of judicial custody on March 19, until April
1.
However,
Allahabad High Court Single Bench of Justice of Rajiv Lochan Shukla was kind
enough to grant bail with conditions to the incarcerated Muslims on May 15 but
also parroted the Hindutva construct of vegetarian Hinduism stating in the
judgement that “members of the Muslim community having a Roza Iftar
party, and during
the said Iftar party, while
partaking of food, non-vegetarian food is said to have been consumed
by the members of the Muslim community, who are then alleged
to have thrown
the remains into the River Ganges. This fact in the
dispassionate opinion of the Court could rightly
be said to hurt religious
sentiments of the Hindu community.”
[https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2026/05/20/allahabad-hc-grants-bail-to-men-accused-of-throwing-non-veg-food-in-river-ganga/]
The Hindutva
juggernaut of vegetarian Hinduism which is running amok in India presently
brazenly violates even decrees of ‘Hindu’ scriptures which it publicly declares
to be the constitution of India replacing the present democratic-secular one.
MANUSMRITI
FOR MEAT EATING
According to VD
Savarkar Manusmriti is the most worshippable scripture after Vedas for Hindus.
[Savarkar, V.D., ‘Women in Manusmriti’ in Savarkar Samagar (collection of
Savarkar’s writings in Hindi) volume IV, Prabhat, Delhi, 2000, p. 416.] RSS
following him demanded Manusmriti as constitution of India when Indian
Constituent Assembly passed the constitution. [RSS English organ Organiser edit
‘The Constitution, November 30, 1949.] This RSS holy
book glorifies eating of flesh as we will see in the following.
*That
land where the black antelope naturally roams, one must know to be fit for the performance of sacrifices; (the
tract) different from that (is) the country of the Mlechas. (II/23)
*[A Brahmin should not eat] food given without
due respect, nor (that which contains) meat eaten for no sacred purpose, nor
(that given) by a female who has no male (relatives), nor the food of an enemy,
nor that (given) by the lord of a town, nor that (given) by outcasts, nor that
on which anybody has sneezed. (IV/213);
*‘The consumption of meat (is
befitting) for sacrifices,’ that is declared to be a rule made by the gods; but
to persist (in using it) on other (occasions) is said to be a proceeding worthy
of Rakshasas. (V/31)
*He
who eats meat, when he honours the gods and manes,
commits no sin, whether he has bought it, or himself has killed (the animal),
or has received it as a present from others.
(V/32)
*A twice-born man who knows the law, must not eat meat except in
conformity with the law; for if he has eaten it unlawfully, he will, unable to
save himself, be eaten after death by his (victims). (V/33)
*After death the guilt of one who slays deer for gain is not as
(great) as that of him who eats meat for no (sacred) purpose. (V/34)
31. *But
a man who, being duly engaged (to officiate or to dine at a sacred rite),
refuses to eat meat, becomes after death an animal during twenty-one
existences. (V/35)
*A
Brahmana must never eat (the flesh of animals unhallowed by Mantras; but,
obedient to the primeval law, he may eat it, consecrated with Vedic texts. (V/36)
*A twice-born man who, knowing the
true meaning of the Veda, slays an animal for these purposes, causes both
himself and the animal to enter a most blessed state. (V/42)
[This selection of Manu’s Codes is
from F. Max Muller, Laws of Manu
(Delhi: LP Publications, 1996; first published in 1886). The bracket after each
code incorporates number of chapter/number of code according to the above
edition.]
KAUTALIYA’S ARTHSASTRA FOR MEAT
EATING
Arthsastra of Kautilya (Chanakya) is
the second book of governance for RSS-BJP rulers. How dear it is to them can be
gauged by the fact that Modi government by organizing Sadhna Saptah (April
2-8, 2026) and Mission Karmayogi declared it to be a basic book for training Indian administrators with
Vedas. Arthsastra has 67 references decreeing flesh eating. The amazing part is
that it has a specific chapter titled ‘Superintendent of Slaughter House’. [R Shamasastry (trans), Kautilya’s
Arthsastra, Mysore Printing and Publishing house, Mysore, 1915, pp. 149-53]
According to the rules of the
slaughter house, “of beasts of prey that have been captured, the Superintendent
shall take one-sixth; of fish and birds (of similar nature), he shall take
one-tenth or more than one-tenth; and of deer and other beasts (mrigapasu), one-tenth or more than
one-tenth as toll…(Butchers) shall sell fresh and boneless flesh of beasts (mrigapasu deer or wild animal) just killed. If they sell bony flesh, they
shall give an equivalent compensation (pratipákam)”
[p. 138].
There is no ban
on slaughter of cows, however, “cattle such as a calf, a bull, or a milch cow
shall not be slaughtered…The flesh of animals which have been killed outside
the slaughter-house (parisúnam),
headless, legless and boneless flesh, rotten flesh, and the flesh of animals
which have suddenly died shall not be sold. Otherwise, a fine of 12 panas shall be imposed [pp. 138-39]”.
People are
allowed to keep stock of dried flesh, skins, tendons (snáyu)…in such quantities as can be enjoyed for years together
without feeling any want. Of such collection, old things shall be replaced by
new ones when received. [p. 55]
Referring to
different kinds of animals, Arthsastra decrees: “When an animal dies a natural
death, they shall surrender the skin with the brand mark, if it is a cow or a
buffalo; the skin together with the ear (karnalakshanam)
if it is a goat or sheep; the tail with the skin containing the brand mark, if
it is an ass or a camel; the skin, if it is a young one; besides the above,
(they shall also restore) the fat (vasti),
bile, marrow (snáyu), teeth, hoofs,
horns, and bones. They (the cowherds) may sell either fresh flesh or dried
flesh.” [p. 147]
Kautilya’s
cities were not inhabited by vegetarian folks as we find that the chapter
‘Building within the Fort’ allots sites for flesh traders; “To the south, the
superintendents of the city, of commerce, of manufactories, and of the army as
well as those who trade in cooked rice, liquor, and flesh, besides prostitutes,
musicians, and the people of Vaisya caste shall live.” [p. 54]
The chapter
titled ‘Superintendent of Store-House’ [p. 101] assigns a duty of collecting
taxes/recovery of past arrears to the superintendent from dealers of ‟Clarified
butter, oil, serum of flesh, and pith or sap (of plants, etc.)…Dried fish,
bulbous roots (kándamúla), fruits and
vegetables form the group of edibles (sakavarga)”.
[pp. 102-103]
The same
chapter while dealing with the contents of each meal of an ARYA, low Castes,
women and children states: “For dressing twenty palas of flesh, [1000 palas make one tula] half a kutumba of oil, one pala of salt, one pala of
sugar (kshára), two dharanas of pungent substances (katuka, spices), and half a prastha of curd (will be necessary). For
dressing greater quantities of flesh, the same ingredients can be
proportionally increased. For cooking sákas
(dried fish and vegetables), the above substances are to be added one and a
half times as much. For dressing dried fish, the above ingredients are to be
added twice as much.” [p. 105]
Under the head ‘Superintendent of
Cows’ the boss has the authority of classifying “cattle as calves, steers, tamable
ones, draught oxen, bulls that are to be trained to yoke, bulls kept for
crossing cows, cattle that are fit only for the supply of flesh…” [p. 146]
According to Chanakya, “When an animal dies a natural death, they shall
surrender the skin with the brand mark, if it is a cow or a buffalo; the skin
together with the ear (karnalakshanam)
if it is a goat or sheep; the tail with the skin containing the brand mark, if
it is an ass or a camel; the skin, if it is a young one; besides the above,
(they shall also restore) the fat (vasti),
bile, marrow (snáyu), teeth, hoofs,
horns, and bones. They (the cowherds) may sell either fresh flesh or dried
flesh.” [p. 147]
It may be shocking for many animal
lovers that the feed for bulls apart from including grass one tulá (100 palas) of oil cakes, 10 ádhakas
of bran, 5 palas of salt (mukhalavanam), one kudumba of oil for rubbing over the nose (nasya), 1 prastha of
drink (pána) added one tulá of flesh in the daily diet. [p. 148]
Daily diet for horse included “50 palas of
flesh”. [p. 150]
Likewise, the
rations for an elephant (of a specific height) includes “50 palas of flesh” and elephant, watchmen,
sweepers, cooks and others shall receive apart from cooked rice, a handful of
oil, sugar and salt 10 palas of
flesh. [pp. 155-158]
The chapter
dealing with ‘Remedies against National Calamities’ prescribes a non-vegetarian
remedy by stating “Persons acquainted with the rituals of the Atharvaveda, and experts in sacred magic
and mysticism shall perform such ceremonials as ward off the danger from
demons. On full-moon days the worship of Chaityas
may be performed by placing on a verandah offerings such as an umbrella,
the picture of an arm, a flag, and some goat's flesh”. [p. 239]
It makes clear
that tax was collected on flesh. “They (the king's employees) may demand of
cultivators one-fourth of their grain, and one-sixth of forest produce (vanya) and of such commodities as
cotton, wax, fabrics, barks of trees, hemp, wool, silk, medicines, sandal,
flowers, fruits, vegetables, firewood, bamboos, flesh, and dried flesh.” [p.
274]
The animal
flesh/serum was used as medicines/remedies also. “When the body of a man is
smeared over with the serum of the flesh of a frog, it burns with fire (with no
hurt)…When the body of a man is smeared over with the above serum as well as
with the oil extracted from the fruits of kusa
(ficus religiosa), and ámra
(mango tree), and when the powder prepared from an ocean frog (samdura mandúki), phenaka (sea-foam), and sarjarasa
(the juice of vatica robusta) is
sprinkled over the body, it burns with fire (without being hurt). When the body
of a man is smeared over with sesamum oil mixed with equal quantities of the
serum of the flesh of a frog, crab, and other animals, it can burn with fire
(without hurt)…paste prepared from the roots of páribhadraka (erythrina
indica), pratibala , vanjula (a kind of ratan or tree), vajra (andropogon muricatum or euphorbia), and kadali (banana), mixed with the serum of the flesh of a frog, can
walk over fire (without hurt). Oil should be extracted from the paste prepared
from the roots of pratibala, vanjula and páribhadraka, all growing near water, the paste being mixed with
the serum of the flesh of a frog. Having anointed one's legs with this oil, one
can walk over a white-hot mass of fire as though on a bed of roses. The paste
prepared from the powder of the rib-bone of náraka
(?), a donkey, kanka (a kind of
vulture), and bhása (a bird), mixed
with the juice of water-lily, is applied to the legs of bipeds and quadrupeds
(while making a journey). The fat or serum derived from roasting a pregnant
camel together with saptaparna (lechites scholaris) or from roasting
dead children in cremation grounds, is applied to render a journey of a hundred
yojanas easy. [pp. 458-60.]
RESTRICTIONS
“King should
prohibit the slaughter of animals for half a month during the period of Cháturmásya (from July to September),
for four nights during the full moon, and for a night on the day of the
birth-star of the conqueror or of the national star. He should also prohibit
the slaughter of females and young ones (yonibálavadham)
as well as castration. Having abolished those customs or transactions which he
might consider either as injurious to the growth of his revenue and army or as
unrighteous, he should establish righteous transactions.” [p. 449.]
BEEF-EATING ESSENTIAL FOR BRAHMINS IN
ANCIENT INDIA
Swami Vivekananda, regarded as a
philosopher of Hindutva by the RSS, while addressing a meeting at the
Shakespeare Club, Pasadena, California, USA (February 2, 1900) on the theme of
‘Buddhistic India’, declared:
“You will be astonished
if I tell you that, according to old ceremonials, he is not a good Hindu who
does not eat beef. On certain occasions he must sacrifice a bull and eat it.” [Vivekananda, The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, vol. 3
(Calcutta: Advaita Ashram, 1997), p. 536.]
He further stated that without eating beef,
“no Brahmin could remain a Brahmin; you read in the Vedas how, when a
Sannyasin [a Hindu religious mendicant], a king, or a great man came into
house, the best bullock was killed…” [Ibid., p. 174.]
This is corroborated by other research
works sponsored by the Ramakrishna Mission established by Vivekananda.
According to C. Kunhan Raja, a prominent authority on the history and culture
of the Vedic period:
“The Vedic Aryans,
including the Brahmanas, ate fish, meat and even beef. A distinguished guest
was honoured with beef served at a meal. Although the Vedic Aryans ate beef,
milch cows were not killed. One of the words that designated cow was aghnya
(what shall not be killed). But a guest was a goghna (one for whom a cow is
killed). It is only bulls, barren cows and calves that were killed.” [Raja, C. Kunhan, Vedic Culture‟, cited in the series, Suniti Kumar
Chatterji and others (eds.), The Cultural Heritage of India, vol. 1 (Calcutta:
The Ramakrishna Mission, 1993), p. 217.]
Kunhan Raja countering the myth of
vegetarian Hinduism stated:
“The Grhya Sutras prescribe different kinds
of meat to be given to be given to children at the first feeding ceremony, for
different results. Mutton, flesh of different kinds of birds, and other forms
of meat were freely eaten by the higher Castes in those days, and still they
were the most spiritual nation in the world.” [Ibid.]
One of the greatest researcher and
authority on Indian politics, religions and culture Dr, BR Ambedkar produced a
brilliant essay on the subject titled ‘Did the Hindus Never Eat Beef?’ All
those who are really interested in understanding the ‘Hindu Past’ must read
this monumental work of Dr. Ambedkar. After studying a large number of Vedic
and Hindu scriptures, he arrived at the conclusion that, “when the learned Brahmins argue that the Hindus not only never ate
beef but they always held the cow to be sacred and were always opposed to the
killing of the cow, it is impossible to accept their view”. [Ambedkar,
B. R., ‘Did the Hindus never eat beef?’ in The Untouchables: Who Were They and Why They Became Untouchables?
in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches, vol. 7, (Government of
Maharashtra, Bombay, 1990, first edition 1948) pp. 323-328.] http://www.countercurrents.org/ambedkar050315.htm Also see great work by Professor DN Jha, The Myth of the Holy Cow, link:
https://archive.org/details/TheMythOfHolyCowJha]
Interestingly, the findings of Ambedkar
were that cows were sacrificed and beef consumed because COWS were HOLY.
According to Ambedkar: "It was not
that the cow was not sacred in Vedic times, it was because of her sacredness
that it is ordained in the Vajasaneyi Samhita that beef should be eaten."
(Dharma Shastra Vichar in Marathi, p. 180). That the Aryans of the Rig Veda did
kill cows for purposes of food and ate beef is abundantly clear from the Rig
Veda itself. In Rig Veda (X. 86.14) Indra says: ‘They cook for one 15 plus
twenty oxen’. The Rig Veda (X.91.14) says that for Agni were sacrificed horses,
bulls, oxen, barren cows and rams. From the Rig Veda (X.72.6) it appears that
the cow was killed with a sword or axe.”
Ambedkar concluded this
essay with the following words: “With this evidence no one can doubt that there
was a time when Hindus, both Brahmins and non-Brahmins, ate not only flesh but
also beef.” [Ibid., pp. 323-328.]
ANANDMATH:
SANTAN/HINDU SENA CONSUMING FLESH
Bankim Chandra Chatterjee is Rishi
for RSS-BJP rulers and his pro-British novel, Anandmath, is a holy
book for Hindu nationalism. A leader of Santan or Hindu army, Jivananda
comes to visit her sister, Nimi who serves him, “some clean, jasmine-white
rice, some tasteful dal, a curry of wild figs, some fish metted [sic] from her own tank and some milk”.
[Sen-Gupta, Nares Chandra
(translator Bankim Chandra Chatterjee’s Anandamath),
Abbey of Bliss, Padmini Mohan Neogi,
Calcutta, nd, p. 65.]
INDIA AS GLOBAL BEEF POWERHOUSE
UNDER MODI
India has
quietly emerged as global beef powerhouse. The country now ranks as the world’s
second-largest beef exporter earning nearly 3.8 billion dollars or around
34,177 crore rupees, annually…Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra,, and Andhra Pradesh
account for the bulk of these exports with Uttar Pradesh alone contributing
nearly 60% of India’s beef shipments.” [“India Becomes
World’s Second-Largest Beef Exporter Amid Cow Vigilante Violence”, Jan 02,
2026, https://www.deshabhimani.com/deshabhimani-english-/national-76192/india-beef-exports-cow-vigilante-violence-48452]
FISHERIES
EXPORT
The vegetarian
India is making great strides in exporting seafood to the world. According to
government of India press release dated April 3, 2026 “India’s seafood exports
have recorded strong and sustained growth, expanding at an average annual rate
of 7% over the past 11 years. Marine product exports have more than doubled
during the period, rising from ₹30,213 crore in 2013‑14 to ₹62,408 crore in
2024‑25, driven largely by shrimp exports valued at ₹43,334 crore. India’s
seafood exports span a wide and diversified basket, with over 350 varieties of
products shipped to nearly 130 global markets.” [https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2248721®=3&lang=1]
UNHOLY USE OF
HOLY GANGA WATER
The Hindutva
claim of Holy Mother Ganga is to be taken not with a pinch of salt but fistful
of salt. According to Government of India data Ganga water is supplied to
Delhi, Patna, Rajgir, Gaya, Bodhgaya, Bhagalpur, and Nawada
(Bihar), Kanpur, Allahabad, Varanasi and several cities in Western
UP, Haridwar (Uttarakhand), and Kolkata (West Bengal).
This supply is
not for fulfilling some religious duties but for all kinds of cleaning, washing
and sanitary purposes. How is this being tolerated? It is high time;
Allahabad High Court should intervene.
Shamsul Islam
May 23, 2026
http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam
Facebook:
https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332
Twitter: @shamsforjustice
http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/
Email: notoinjustice@gmail.com
Link for procuring Shamsul Islam’s books in English, Hindi & Urdu:
https://tinyurl.com/shams-books
